Amber Heard’s lawyers have built a further phone for a re-trial of her defamation scenario with Johnny Depp.
In documents filed on Friday, the actress’s authorized crew claimed that 1 of the people today originally summoned to provide as a juror in the demo had not appeared and experienced been replaced by another person else.
The documents, reported by the PA news agency, stated: “Juror No 15 was not the unique summoned for jury responsibility on 11 April, 2022, and hence was not aspect of the jury panel and could not have adequately served on the jury at this trial.
“As the court no doubt agrees, it is deeply troubling for an personal not summoned for jury responsibility nonetheless to look for jury duty and provide on a jury, specifically in a situation these as this.
“This was a significant-profile circumstance, exactly where the point and day of the jury demo had been very publicised prior to and right after the issuance of the juror summonses.”
Attorneys additional that Ms Read experienced the suitable “to rely on primary safety… that the jurors in this demo would be people today who had been basically summoned for jury duty”.
“Ms Heard’s due system was consequently compromised,” the paperwork mentioned.
“Underneath these circumstances, a mistrial should be declared, and a new demo ordered.”
Depp v Read: The vital pieces of proof from six months of ‘soap opera’ trial
The information arrives just times soon after Heard’s lawyers manufactured yet another call for a re-trial, claiming the original judgment had not been supported by evidence.
Depp sued Heard, his former partner, over a 2018 short article she wrote for the Washington Post about her activities as a survivor of domestic abuse, which his lawyers said falsely accused him of being an abuser.
Depp denied abusing Heard and told jurors that his ex-wife’s allegations of domestic violence ended up “heinous and disturbing”.
Listened to insisted her short article was not about her ex-partner, but about the “bigger cultural discussion” bordering the #MeToo motion at the time.
Immediately after 6 months of testimony, the court docket circumstance came to an conclusion on 1 June, with the jury finding that the posting was defamatory toward Depp, who was awarded $10.35m (£8.2m) in damages.
Examine a lot more:
Depp v Heard: How has on the net abuse of Amber Read come to be acceptable?
Listened to did win on just one rely of her counter-match, successfully arguing that a person of Depp’s lawyers defamed her by claiming her allegations were “an abuse hoax” aimed at capitalising on the #MeToo motion.
The jury awarded her $2m (£1.5m) in damages.