‘Burning The united states To The Ground’: Liberals Blast SCOTUS EPA Decision

‘Burning The united states To The Ground’: Liberals Blast SCOTUS EPA Decision
‘Burning The united states To The Ground’: Liberals Blast SCOTUS EPA Decision
  • Liberals sharply criticized the Supreme Court’s selection in West Virginia v. Environmental Defense Company that limited boundaries on emissions.
  • “The court is totally fraudulent,” Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland claimed all through an look on MSNBC.
  • Other liberals reiterated calls to close the filibuster and to “expand” the Supreme Court.

Liberals lambasted the Supreme Court soon after the justices ruled the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) exceeded its authority Thursday.

The large courtroom issued a 6-3 choice in West Virginia v. Environmental Security Company Thursday that limits the electricity of government organizations. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the EPA exceeded its authority when it sought to impose caps on energy plant emissions.

“The decades-prolonged combat to secure citizens from company polluters is staying wiped out by these MAGA extremist justices,” Senate The greater part Leader Chuck Schumer posted on Twitter. “Every Republican who helped seat these justices is complicit.”

“The court is totally fraudulent, and the only point that could clarify their decisions is correct-wing Republican dogma,” Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland informed MSNBC host Chris Hayes Thursday evening. (Associated: ‘What Other Judicial Outrage Need to We Endure?’: Dems Get in touch with For Expanding SCOTUS Immediately after String Of Losses)


“The SCOTUS—which has local weather scientists—just ruled 6-3 that the EPA, which Congress especially made to guard the setting, does not have the authority to guard the atmosphere,” Qasim Rashad, host of “The Qasim Rashad Show” on Sirius XM, posted on Twitter. “GOP is literally burning America to the floor & we can’t even abolish the filibuster.”

Previous Secretary of Labor Robert B. Reich also slammed the court’s decision.

“The illegitimate Supreme Courtroom just focused a 38-12 months-old precedent that empowers federal companies to protect you,” Reich posted. “They want you to drink filthy water, eat contaminated foodstuff, and breathe filthy air. Doesn’t seem ‘pro-life’ to me.”

Some of the most liberal customers of the Home of Reps also lambasted the ruling.

“This extremist, radical Supreme Courtroom is not just rolling back essential rights – they are endangering our earth and our foreseeable future,” Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, posted. “Enough is more than enough. Conclusion the filibuster and extend the Courtroom.”

“Fascist SCOTUS guts the EPA’s capacity to control carbon emissions, fight local weather modify,” Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, said. “The federal governing administration will be restricted from regulating everything of significance in the absence of a crystal clear Congressional directive to do so.”

Schumer, Raskin, Jayapal and Tlaib did not immediately answer to requests for comment from The Every day Caller Information Foundation.

Information made by The Every day Caller Information Foundation is accessible devoid of cost to any eligible information publisher that can give a big audience. For licensing options of our initial information, you should speak to [email protected].

Share this post

Similar Posts