[ad_1]
Johnson, N. P. & Mueller, J. Updating the accounts: global mortality of the 1918–1920 “Spanish” influenza pandemic. Bull. Hist. Med. 76, 105–115 (2002).
Dong, E. Du, H. & and Gardner, L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet 20, 533–534 (2020).
Pei, S., Yamana, T. K., Kandula, S., Galanti, M. & Shaman, J. Burden and characteristics of COVID-19 in the United States during 2020. Nature 598, 338–341 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kim, Y. C., Dema, B. & Reyes-Sandoval, A. COVID-19 vaccines: breaking record times to first-in-human trials. NPJ Vaccines 5, 34 (2020).
Jester, B. J., Uyeki, T. M., Patel, A., Koonin, L. & Jernigan, D. B. 100 Years of medical countermeasures and pandemic influenza preparedness. Am. J. Public Health 108, 1469–1472 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fineberg, H. V. Pandemic preparedness and response—lessons from the H1N1 influenza of 2009. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 1335–1342 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bedford, J. et al. A new twenty-first century science for effective epidemic response. Nature 575, 130–136 (2019).
Google Scholar
Whitelaw, S., Mamas, M. A., Topol, E. & Van Spall, H. G. Applications of digital technology in COVID-19 pandemic planning and response. Lancet Digit. Health 2, e435–e440 (2020).
Kim, J., Campbell, A. S., de Ávila, B. E.-F. & Wang, J. Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 389–406 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tromberg, B. J. et al. Rapid scaling up of Covid-19 diagnostic testing in the United States—the NIH RADx initiative. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1071–1077 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kliff, S. & Sanger-Katz, M. Bottleneck for US coronavirus response: the fax machine. The New York Times (13 July 2020).
Mahindra, A. et al. Paper card-based vs application-based vaccine credentials: a comparison. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.04512 (2021).
Bates, M. Tracking disease: digital epidemiology offers new promise in predicting outbreaks. IEEE Pulse 8, 18–22 (2017).
Google Scholar
Brown, B., Chui, M. & Manyika, J. Are you ready for the era of ‘big data’. McKinsey and Company https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/are-you-ready-for-the-era-of-big-data (2011).
Mackert, M., Mabry-Flynn, A., Champlin, S., Donovan, E. E. & Pounders, K. Health literacy and health information technology adoption: the potential for a new digital divide. J. Med. Internet Res. 18, e264 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bol, N., Helberger, N. & Weert, J. C. Differences in mobile health app use: a source of new digital inequalities? Inf. Soc. 34, 183–193 (2018).
Google Scholar
Brewer, L. C. et al. Back to the future: achieving health equity through health informatics and digital health. JMIR mHealth uHealth 8, e14512 (2020).
Google Scholar
Price, W. N. & Cohen, I. G. Privacy in the age of medical big data. Nat. Med. 25, 37–43 (2019).
Google Scholar
Landau, S. Digital exposure tools: design for privacy, efficacy, and equity apps can cut transmission of SARS-CoV-2—but how do we ensure that they don’t exacerbate public health inequities? Science 373, 1202–1204 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, D. et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 323, 1061–1069 (2020).
Google Scholar
Guan, W.-j et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1708–1720 (2020).
Google Scholar
Radin, J. M., Wineinger, N. E., Topol, E. J. & Steinhubl, S. R. Harnessing wearable device data to improve state-level real-time surveillance of influenza-like illness in the USA: a population-based study. Lancet Digit. Health 2, e85–e93 (2020).
Google Scholar
Quer, G. et al. Wearable sensor data and self-reported symptoms for COVID-19 detection. Nat. Med. 27, 73–77 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ferretti, L. et al. Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing. Science 368, eabb6936 (2020).
Yang, S., Santillana, N. & Kou, S. C. Accurate estimation of influenza epidemics using Google search data via ARGO. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14463–14478 (2015).
Meyers, D. J. et al. Combining healthcare-based and participatory approaches to surveillance: trends in diarrheal and respiratory conditions collected by a mobile phone system by community health workers in rural Nepal. PLoS ONE 11, e0152738 (2016).
Google Scholar
Smolinski, M. S. et al. Flu near you: crowdsourced symptom reporting spanning 2 influenza seasons. Am. J. Public Health 105, 2124–2130 (2015).
Google Scholar
Guerrisi, C. et al. Participatory syndromic surveillance of influenza in Europe. J. Infect. Dis. 214, S386–S392 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wójcik, O. P., Brownstein, J. S., Chunara, R. & Johansson, M. A. Public health for the people: participatory infectious disease surveillance in the digital age. Emerg. Themes Epidemiol. 11, 7 (2014).
Leal-Neto, O., Santos, F., Lee, J. Y., Albuquerque, J. & Souza, W. V. Prioritizing COVID-19 tests based on participatory surveillance and spatial scanning. Int. J. Med. Inform. 143, 104263 (2020).
Google Scholar
Leal-Neto, O. et al. Digital SARS-CoV-2 detection among hospital employees: participatory surveillance study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 7, e33576 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sudre, C. H. et al. Anosmia, ageusia, and other COVID-19-like symptoms in association with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, across six national digital surveillance platforms: an observational study. Lancet Digit. Health 3, e577–e586 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cook, S., Conrad, C., Fowlkes, A. L. & Mohebbi, M. H. Assessing Google flu trends performance in the United States during the 2009 influenza virus A (H1N1) pandemic. PLoS ONE 6, e23610 (2011).
Google Scholar
Freifeld, C. C., Mandl, K. D., Reis, B. Y. & Brownstein, J. S. HealthMap: global infectious disease monitoring through automated classification and visualization of Internet media reports. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15, 150–157 (2008).
Google Scholar
Hossain, N. & Househ, M. S. Using HealthMap to analyse Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) data. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 226, 213–216 (2016).
Chamberlain, S. D. et al. Real-time detection of COVID-19 epicenters within the United States using a network of smart thermometers. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.06.20039909 (2020).
Miller, A. C., Peterson, R. A., Singh, I., Pilewski, S. & Polgreen, P. M. Improving state-level influenza surveillance byincorporating real-time smartphone-connected thermometer readings across different geographic domains. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, ofz455 (2019).
Google Scholar
Miller, A. C., Singh, I., Koehler, E. & Polgreen, P. M. A smartphone-driven thermometer application for real-time population-and individual-level influenza surveillance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 67, 388–397 (2018).
Google Scholar
Brueck, H. Florida is looking like the next major US hotspot of COVID-19, according to a strikingly accurate thermometer map that shows where cases may surge next. Business Insider https://www.businessinsider.com/kinsa-thermometer-readings-could-track-covid-19-across-us-2020-3?r=US&IR=T (2020).
Gangavarapu, K. et al. Outbreak.info genomic reports: scalable and dynamic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants and mutations. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.27.22269965 (2022).
Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G. & Vespignani, A. The parable of Google Flu: traps in big data analysis. Science 343, 1203–1205 (2014).
Google Scholar
SAFER-COVID: A safe return to daily activities. CareEvolution https://careevolution.com/mydatahelps-research-wellness-platform/safer-covid/ (2020).
Liang, F. COVID-19 and health code: how digital platforms tackle the pandemic in China. Soc. Media Soc. 6, 2056305120947657 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vespignani, A. et al. Modelling Covid-19. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 279–281 (2020).
Google Scholar
Behnam, M., Dey, A., Gambell, T. & Talwar, V. COVID-19: overcoming supply shortages for diagnostic testing. McKinsey and Company https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/life-sciences/our-insights/covid-19-overcoming-supply-shortages-for-diagnostic-testing (2020).
Loclainn, M.N. et al. Key predictors of attending hospital with COVID19: an association study from the COVID symptom Tracker APP in 2,618,948 individual. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.20079251 (2020).
Menni, C. et al. Real-time tracking of self-reported symptoms to predict potential COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 1037–1040 (2020).
Google Scholar
COVID-19 App (Apple, 2020).
Li, X. et al. Digital health: tracking physiomes and activity using wearable biosensors reveals useful health-related information. PLoS Biol. 15, e2001402 (2017).
Google Scholar
Scripps Research Translational Institute. DETECT https://detect.scripps.edu (2020).
Gadaleta, M. et al. Passive detection of COVID-19 with wearable sensors and explainable machine learning algorithms. NPJ Digit. Med. 4, 166 (2021).
Google Scholar
Radin, J. M. et al. Assessment of prolonged physiological and behavioral changes associated with COVID-19 infection. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e2115959 (2021).
Google Scholar
Quer, G. et al. Inter-individual variation in objective measure of reactogenicity following COVID-19 vaccination via smartwatches and fitness bands. NPJ Dig. Med. 5, 49 (2022).
Google Scholar
Stanford Healthcare Innovation Lab. Infectious Disease and COVID-19 Wearables Study https://nnovations.stanford.edu/wearables (2019).
Natarajan, A., Su, H.-W. & Heneghan, C. Assessment of physiological signs associated with COVID-19 measured using wearable devices. NPJ Digit. Med. 3, 156 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mishra, T. et al. Pre-symptomatic detection of COVID-19 from smartwatch data. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 1208–1220 (2020).
Google Scholar
Alavi, A. et al. Real-time alerting system for COVID-19 and other stress events using wearable data. Nat. Med. 28, 175–184 (2022).
Google Scholar
Robert Koch Institut. Corona Datenspende https://corona-datnspende.de/science/en (2020).
Miller, D. J. et al. Analyzing changes in respiratory rate to predict the risk of COVID-19 infection. PLoS ONE 15, e0243693 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. et al. Characterizing COVID-19 and influenza illnesses in the real world via person-generated health data. Patterns 2, 100188 (2021).
Google Scholar
Brakenhoff, T. B. et al. A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the remote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 22, 412 (2021).
Martinez‐Jimenez, M. A. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of infrared thermal imaging for detecting COVID‐19 infection in minimally symptomatic patients. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 51, e13474 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, P. Q. et al. Wearable materials with embedded synthetic biology sensors for biomolecule detection. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1366–1374 (2021).
Kahn, J. P. Digital Contact Tracing for Pandemic Response: Ethics and Governance Guidance (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2020).
Budd, J. et al. Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 1183–1192 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wu, J. T., Leung, K. & Leung, G. M. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Lancet 395, 689–697 (2020).
Google Scholar
Park, S., Choi, G. J. & Ko, H. Information technology–based tracing strategy in response to COVID-19 in South Korea—privacy controversies. JAMA 323, 2129–2130 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, C. J., Ng, C. Y. & Brook, R. H. Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: big data analytics, new technology, and proactive testing. JAMA 323, 1341–1342 (2020).
Google Scholar
Colizza, V. et al. Time to evaluate COVID-19 contact-tracing apps. Nat. Med. 27, 361–362 (2021).
Google Scholar
Apple. Apple and Google partner on COVID-19 contact tracing technology. Apple https://www.apple.com/uk/newsroom/2020/04/apple-and-google-partner-on-covid-19-contact-tracing-technology/ (2020).
Arevalo, F. N. Decoding the public interest of Aarogya Setu, contact tracing app for managing the COVID-19 pandemic in India. In Proc. 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) 508–512 (IEEE, 2020).
Aravindan, A. & Phartiyal, S. Bluetooth phone apps for tracking COVID-19 show modest early results. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-apps-idUSKCN2232A0 (2020).
Probyn, A. Coronavirus lockdowns could end in months if Australians are willing to have their movements monitored. ABC https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-14/coronavirus-app-government-wants-australians-to-download/12148210 (2020).
Morley, J., Cowls, J., Taddeo, M. & Floridi, L. Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps. Nature 582, 29–31 (2020).
Grande, D. et al. Consumer views on using digital data for COVID-19 control in the United States. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e2110918 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bahrain, Kuwait and Norway contact tracing apps among most dangerous for privacy. Amnesty International https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/06/bahrain-kuwait-norway-contact-tracing-apps-danger-for-privacy/ (2020).
Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I., Ahmad, A., Ahmed, M. & Alam, A. Mobile applications to fight against COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Saudi Arabia. TEM J. 10, 69–77 (2021).
Wymant, C. et al. The epidemiological impact of the NHS COVID-19 App. Nature 594, 408–412 (2021).
Google Scholar
Menges, D., Aschmann, H. E., Moser, A., Althaus, C. L. & Von Wyl, V. A data-driven simulation of the exposure notification cascade for digital contact tracing of SARS-CoV-2 in Zurich, Switzerland. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e218184 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ladyzhets, B. We investigated whether digital contact tracing actually worked in the US. Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/06/16/1026255/us-digital-contact-tracing-exposure-notification-analysis/ (2021).
Steinhauer, J. & Goodenough. A. Contact tracing is failing in many states. Here’s why. The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/31/health/covid-contact-tracing-tests.html (31 July 2020).
O’Neill, P. H. No, coronavirus apps don’t need 60% adoption to be effective. Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/06/05/1002775/covid-apps-effective-at-less-than-60-percent-download/ (2020).
Rüdiger, S. et al. Predicting the SARS-CoV-2 effective reproduction number using bulk contact data from mobile phones. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2026731118 (2021).
Krieg, S. J. et al. Data-driven testing program improves detection of COVID-19 cases and reduces community transmission. NPJ Digit. Med. 5, 17 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sharma, T. & Bashir, M. Use of apps in the COVID-19 response and the loss of privacy protection. Nat. Med. 26, 1165–1167 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gasser, U., Ienca, M., Scheibner, J., Sleigh, J. & Vayena, E. Digital tools against COVID-19: taxonomy, ethical challenges, and navigation aid. Lancet Digit. Health 2, e425–e434 (2020).
Ting, D. S. W., Carin, L., Dzau, V. & Wong, T. Y. Digital technology and COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 459–461 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rimmer, A. Sixty seconds on… the pingdemic. BMJ 374, 1822 (2021).
Mina, M. J. & Andersen, K. G. COVID-19 testing: one size does not fit all. Science 371, 126–127 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dror, A. A. et al. Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 35, 775–779 (2020).
Google Scholar
Geneviève, L. D. et al. Participatory disease surveillance systems: ethical framework. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, e12273 (2019).
Google Scholar
